What is the definition of coparenting? For parents involved in high conflict custody cases, the courts and professionals involved with these cases believe that you must "learn" to coparent. But when asked to define coparenting, many professionals disagree with one another about what coparenting actually means and bow parents are really supposed to coparent with each other if there has been conflict between them.
Let me first define coparenting according to my experience with non-conflictual couples:
1. Coparenting is defined when both of the parents believe that the other parent is acting in the best interest for their children.
2. Both of the parents believe that the other parent is essential in the children's lives and will actively support the children's relationship with the other parent.
3. Both of the parents, although they may disagree about how to handle a situation related to the children, will in the end both support each other in the decision and actively follow through with the decision they made.
4. One parent may do more of the decision making between the two parents, but the other parent, maybe by default will support the way they parent the child or at least not argue with the other parent and actively sabotage the other parent's efforts.
Here is my definition for conflictual coparenting according to my experience with conflictual couples:
1. One or both of the parents does not believe that the other parent is acting in the best interests of the children.
2. One or both of the parents believes that the other parent has parental deficiencies, a personality disorder, substance abuses issues or is in some way dangerous for the children and this parent will actively thwart the children's relationship with the other parent.
3. One or both of the parents knows that they need the intervention of the courts to assist them with child sharing decisions, but once the decisions have been made, one or both of the parents actively sabotages the court order, by undermining and bad-mouthing the professionals, the other parent, or by not following the court order because there is not penalty for breaking the order, or because the order is not specific enough to follow to the letter of the law.
It is a philosophical difference between coparents and conflictual parents:
For high conflict parents, it is obvious that there is a philosophical difference between parents who believe they are both good for the children and for those who believe that one of the parents is not good for the children. Thus you have parents who can work together and parents who will never be able to work together.
Court Professionals, (as well as the entire population of people surrounding a conflictual family) often make the statement to the parents, "You loved each other once, why can't you just put your differences aside for the sake of the children?" This sounds reasonable to the outsider, until, you understand that there is more going on than a few differences between the parents and the "love" between the parents may never have existed in the first place. Often, high conflict cases consist of one of the parents having a high conflict personality while the other parent is trying hard to get them to stop harming the children. One or both of these parents believe that the other parent is detrimental to the children and they seek the court's assistance to protect the children.
Unfortunately, the court's often don't have the resources to really find out is a parent is detrimental to the children, they common focus through legislature now is to provide both parents with "equal access" to the children, (which is interpreted by parents as 50/50 time share) and most often the courts don't care about what the parents report about the other parent. The number of high conflict cases continues to rise and the courts are not equipped to handle these cases. The courts resort to outside professionals making recommendations to the courts regarding child sharing issues. Unfortunately, because most professionals believe that the parents must learn to "get along" and "coparent" the fights never get resolved, but instead become further exaccerbated by one or both of the parents fighting the recommendations. The recommendations, often mean that the professionals try to end the fight by dividing the children in half between the two homes, which further compounds the parent's fears about the other parent's detriment to the children. Most professionals are not educated on how to manage high conflict cases, so the case becomes even more litigious rather than calming down.
One of the keys to understanding what needs to happen in these cases is that it only takes one parent to end the conflict and it only takes one parent to save the children from being permanently scarred by the fight. It is a waste of time to think the parents can "learn to get along" with each other, because if they could have done so, they would have already do it without a court order to "learn to coparent."
When I say, it only takes one parent to end the conflict, I mean that one of the two parents has to learn how to let go of the fight, let go of their efforts to get the courts to see that the other parent is the problem, and they have to let go of the their desire for revenge, justice or truth through the courts. They have to want to get on with their life. The high conflict has taken on a life of it's own, there is energy in the fighting, there is energy (although negative energy) in continuous hate between the parents. It is very scary to let go of the fight if you believe you will lose your children or they will be screwed up by the EX if you don't do something about it.
It is not the "high conflict parent" who actually ends the fight, it is usually the good parent who says, " I don't want to fight anymore and I will learn how to end this once and for all. " The parent must learn how to let go of the EX, connect more closely to the children to make sure they feel bonded with them and they have to know that fighting is destroying their relationship with the children as much as their efforts to stop the EX from damaging the children.
Parent must begin to specifically work on ways to implement the idea that their part of the fight is over. I teach parents and professionals specific strategies to re-frame their feelings, fears and frustrations when dealing with the EX.

Letting go of the EX is sometimes extremely difficult if the EX is totally focused on destroying you and keeping you away from the children. You need to learn tactical ways to end the interaction, end the reactions to the EX that keep them going after you. Learning to redirect your energy toward your children is much more fun and rewarding. That's another posting!
Let me first define coparenting according to my experience with non-conflictual couples:
1. Coparenting is defined when both of the parents believe that the other parent is acting in the best interest for their children.
2. Both of the parents believe that the other parent is essential in the children's lives and will actively support the children's relationship with the other parent.
3. Both of the parents, although they may disagree about how to handle a situation related to the children, will in the end both support each other in the decision and actively follow through with the decision they made.
4. One parent may do more of the decision making between the two parents, but the other parent, maybe by default will support the way they parent the child or at least not argue with the other parent and actively sabotage the other parent's efforts.
Here is my definition for conflictual coparenting according to my experience with conflictual couples:
1. One or both of the parents does not believe that the other parent is acting in the best interests of the children.
2. One or both of the parents believes that the other parent has parental deficiencies, a personality disorder, substance abuses issues or is in some way dangerous for the children and this parent will actively thwart the children's relationship with the other parent.
3. One or both of the parents knows that they need the intervention of the courts to assist them with child sharing decisions, but once the decisions have been made, one or both of the parents actively sabotages the court order, by undermining and bad-mouthing the professionals, the other parent, or by not following the court order because there is not penalty for breaking the order, or because the order is not specific enough to follow to the letter of the law.
It is a philosophical difference between coparents and conflictual parents:
For high conflict parents, it is obvious that there is a philosophical difference between parents who believe they are both good for the children and for those who believe that one of the parents is not good for the children. Thus you have parents who can work together and parents who will never be able to work together.
Court Professionals, (as well as the entire population of people surrounding a conflictual family) often make the statement to the parents, "You loved each other once, why can't you just put your differences aside for the sake of the children?" This sounds reasonable to the outsider, until, you understand that there is more going on than a few differences between the parents and the "love" between the parents may never have existed in the first place. Often, high conflict cases consist of one of the parents having a high conflict personality while the other parent is trying hard to get them to stop harming the children. One or both of these parents believe that the other parent is detrimental to the children and they seek the court's assistance to protect the children.
Unfortunately, the court's often don't have the resources to really find out is a parent is detrimental to the children, they common focus through legislature now is to provide both parents with "equal access" to the children, (which is interpreted by parents as 50/50 time share) and most often the courts don't care about what the parents report about the other parent. The number of high conflict cases continues to rise and the courts are not equipped to handle these cases. The courts resort to outside professionals making recommendations to the courts regarding child sharing issues. Unfortunately, because most professionals believe that the parents must learn to "get along" and "coparent" the fights never get resolved, but instead become further exaccerbated by one or both of the parents fighting the recommendations. The recommendations, often mean that the professionals try to end the fight by dividing the children in half between the two homes, which further compounds the parent's fears about the other parent's detriment to the children. Most professionals are not educated on how to manage high conflict cases, so the case becomes even more litigious rather than calming down.
One of the keys to understanding what needs to happen in these cases is that it only takes one parent to end the conflict and it only takes one parent to save the children from being permanently scarred by the fight. It is a waste of time to think the parents can "learn to get along" with each other, because if they could have done so, they would have already do it without a court order to "learn to coparent."
When I say, it only takes one parent to end the conflict, I mean that one of the two parents has to learn how to let go of the fight, let go of their efforts to get the courts to see that the other parent is the problem, and they have to let go of the their desire for revenge, justice or truth through the courts. They have to want to get on with their life. The high conflict has taken on a life of it's own, there is energy in the fighting, there is energy (although negative energy) in continuous hate between the parents. It is very scary to let go of the fight if you believe you will lose your children or they will be screwed up by the EX if you don't do something about it.
It is not the "high conflict parent" who actually ends the fight, it is usually the good parent who says, " I don't want to fight anymore and I will learn how to end this once and for all. " The parent must learn how to let go of the EX, connect more closely to the children to make sure they feel bonded with them and they have to know that fighting is destroying their relationship with the children as much as their efforts to stop the EX from damaging the children.
Parent must begin to specifically work on ways to implement the idea that their part of the fight is over. I teach parents and professionals specific strategies to re-frame their feelings, fears and frustrations when dealing with the EX.

Letting go of the EX is sometimes extremely difficult if the EX is totally focused on destroying you and keeping you away from the children. You need to learn tactical ways to end the interaction, end the reactions to the EX that keep them going after you. Learning to redirect your energy toward your children is much more fun and rewarding. That's another posting!








